Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

errors in reasoning

plain english help for critical thinking in IB Philosophy & SQA Higher Philosophy

errors in reasoning

Main menu

  • Home
  • About (& biblio)
  • Arguments
    • Arguments in Philosophy
      • Bad Arguments
        • formal fallacies
        • informal fallacies
        • SQA Higher Philosophy Glossary
      • Understanding Arguments
        • Understanding Arguments Part 1 ( Higher / IB Philosophy ) – 2 Types of Argument
        • Understanding Arguments Part 2 ( Higher / IB Philosophy ) – soundness & validity
  • blog
  • Reasoning ”Tools’

Tag Archives: parks & rec.

Another Parks & Rec. example (s5e4 7m30s)

Posted on March 8, 2018 by jburt

If we allow this filth to be taught to our seniors, the next you thing you know, it’ll be in our high schools, then our kindergartens, and before you know it, we have babies in thong underwear. Is that what you want?

Posted in test yourself... | Tagged fallacy, parks & rec., test yourself

S3 Tags:

  • absurd
  • absurdum
  • arguments
  • Bill O'Reilly
  • causation
  • core
  • correlation
  • dodge
  • equivocation
  • examples
  • extension
  • fallacy
  • family guy
  • fox news
  • higher
  • higher philosophy
  • homunculus
  • IB philosophy
  • international baccalaureate philosophy
  • is/ought
  • kurt cameron
  • lessons
  • parks & rec.
  • peter griffon
  • post hoc
  • reductio
  • reductio ad absurdum
  • slippery slope
  • test yourself
  • the office
  • The Walking Dead
  • tools for arguing
Proudly powered by WordPress